Mac Expert 1995 Winter/Mac Expert - Winter 95.iso/Les fichiers/Tidbits/Tidbits 201 à 280/TidBITS#280⁄05-Jun-95

Text File | 1995-06-25 | 29.1 KB | 615 lines | [TEXT/ttxt]

TidBITS#280/05-Jun-95
=====================

Spending spree! News this week includes IBM's sudden attempt to
   buy Lotus, while in the background AOL seems to have purchased
   just about everybody else. In addition, we bring you
   information on updating your USR Sportster modem, a follow-up
   to Tonya's article on pesky ReadMe files, information on that
   (ahem) "viral" component in Windows 95, and finally a
   revealing essay from Dave Winer on why software companies just
   don't have a clue.

This issue of TidBITS sponsored in part by:
* APS Technologies -- 800/443-4199 -- <[e-mail]>
   Makers of hard drives, tape drives, and neat SCSI accessories.
   For APS price lists, email: <[e-mail]>
* Northwest Nexus -- 206/455-3505 -- http://www.halcyon.com/
   Providing access to the global Internet. <[e-mail]>
* Hayden Books, an imprint of Macmillan Computer Publishing
   Save 20% on all books via the Web -- http://www.mcp.com/
   Win free books! -- http://www.mcp.com/hayden/madness/

Copyright 1990-1995 Adam & Tonya Engst. Details at end of issue.
   Information: <[e-mail]> Comments: <[e-mail]>
   ---------------------------------------------------------------

Topics:
    MailBITS/05-Jun-95
    Look, It's Windows - Can We Calm Down?
    AOL Buys Everyone
    ReadMe Files? Read This Follow-up!
    A Studio in Silicon Valley
    Reviews/05-Jun-95

ftp://ftp.tidbits.com/pub/tidbits/issues/1995/TidBITS#280_05-Jun-95.etx


MailBITS/05-Jun-95
------------------
  Last Saturday night marked an interesting point in the development
  of the Internet as a multimedia delivery system. We were invited
  to the offices of Point of Presence Company in Seattle to watch
  the first full-length feature film (called _Party_Girl_) played
  live over the Internet via CU-SeeMe. I doubt CU-SeeMe will become
  a major source of movies via the Internet (since it's more
  designed as a point-to-point system), but proving something can be
  done is important because it raises the bar for future attempts. A
  real-time technology for video that works like RealAudio is
  probably the next step, and then I'm sure we'll see some truly
  interesting uses of video on the Internet. [ACE]

http://www.polis.com/firstlook/party/default.html


**The Lotus-Eaters** -- Remember when the aborted Microsoft-Intuit
  merger - valued at over $2 billion - would have been the largest
  such deal in the history of the computing industry? No more! IBM
  today announced a $60 per share bid to take over Lotus Development
  Corporation. If the deal goes through it would be valued at
  approximately $3.3 billion, and IBM indicates it intends to pay
  for the purchase from "cash on hand." Lotus has resisted tight
  ties with IBM in the past, and this takeover bid has been
  characterized as "potentially hostile," with IBM pursuing legal
  action to prevent Lotus from using a "poison pill" anti-takeover
  strategy. As of mid-morning, Lotus stock was up more than 25
  points, with a volume over 10 million shares. [GD]

http://www.ibm.com/News/June5/


**Patrick T. Pruyne** <[e-mail]> writes:
  Owners of U.S. Robotics v.34 Sportster modems should act fast to
  receive a free ROM chip upgrade. Until 12-Jun-95 users providing a
  proper serial number will receive the chip (manufacture date
  18-Apr-95) at **no** charge. Following that date, USR's standard
  $15 shipping and handling fee will apply.

  The release is a response, in part, to widespread reports of
  "Spiral Death" syndrome. The phenomenon is described as a heat-
  related failure to fall forward to higher speeds resulting in
  ever-slower transmission rates. According to USR, the chip also
  incorporates the current v.34 code which should provide improved
  compatibility with different types of v.34 modems. In addition to
  USR's standard technical support phone lines, owners can use USR's
  bulletin board to order the replacement chip. The chip sets will
  not work in any non-U.S. Robotics modems nor U.S. Robotics modems
  that are not already v.FC or v.34 class. U.S. Robotics -- 800/543-
  5844 -- 708/982-5151 (tech support) -- 708/933-552 (fax) --
  708/982-5092 (BBS) -- <[e-mail]> (use the subject line: IOD
  LIVE).


**RAM Doubler 1.5.2 Patch** -- The last two issues of TidBITS -
  TidBITS-278_ and TidBITS-279_ - reported on Connectix's new RAM
  Doubler 1.5.2 and 1.5.2a. (To recap, the RAM Doubler 1.5.2a
  Updater has a higher memory allocation, thus correcting troubles
  some people had with updating to version 1.5.2; if you
  successfully updated to version 1.5.2, you don't need 1.5.2a.) If
  you recently downloaded either RAM Doubler updater, you may have
  noticed a RAM Doubler 1.5.2 patch. The patch is an extension, and
  it corrects a freezing problem that happens when you launch
  Symantec Project Manager 8.0 or 8.0.1 on a Power Macintosh running
  RAM Doubler 1.5.2. The patch does not correct any other problems.
  If you need the patch, here's the URL: [TJE]

ftp://mirror.aol.com//pub/info-mac/cfg/ram-doubler-152-patch.hqx


**Lower Royalties for VR** -- In mid-May, Apple announced it was
  reducing the royalties it charges developers to publish material
  using QuickTime VR. The company waives royalties for non-
  commercial use of QuickTime VR, as well as for internal
  distribution within companies or educational institutions.
  Developers who wish to distribute QuickTime VR run-time software
  outside their organizations may do so with no royalty charge for
  fewer than 25,000 CD-ROM titles or 50,000 enhanced audio CDs.
  Above those quantities, Apple charges a royalty of $400 per 5,000
  CD-ROM titles or $750 per 25,000 enhanced audio CDs. At the same
  time, the company has reduced the cost of the QuickTime VR
  Authoring Tools suite from $2,000 to $495 for the PAL and NTSC
  tools. (A bundle of both tools, plus MPW Pro, is $695.) Anyone who
  wishes to distribute Apple software must still execute a license
  agreement. The tools themselves are available from APDA at
  800/282-2732. Apple Software Licensing --
  <[e-mail]> -- 512/919-2645 [MHA]


Look, It's Windows - Can We Calm Down?
--------------------------------------
  by Geoff Duncan <[e-mail]>

  Reports are circulating on the nets and via "reputable" news
  sources that Windows 95 contains a "viral" feature called the
  Registration Wizard. This feature allegedly catalogs software and
  applications on a Windows 95 machine (and every system connected
  to it via a network), and then sends that information to Microsoft
  via Windows 95's online registration system.

  TidBITS is tired of hearing about this (we're a Mac publication,
  folks!), so here's the scoop. First, there's nothing "viral" about
  the Registration Wizard - that word is just some dolt's idea of
  sensational journalism. The Registration Wizard is an application
  that in no way propagates or spreads to other disks or machines.

  Second, the Registration Wizard isn't designed to sniff through
  your hard disk and find juicy letters or code snippets you may
  have written: it **is** designed as a technical support tool.
  Anyone who's ever tried to help a Windows user over the phone
  knows why such a tool (and the system information it provides)
  would be useful. Microsoft Network - a separate beastie from the
  Registration Wizard, mind you - does upload information about the
  Windows 95 build and language installed (English, German, Dutch,
  etc.) so that users can take advantage of online updates without
  becoming a Certified MSN Upgrade Engineer. But remember, that's a
  separate deal from the Registration Wizard.

  Third, yes, the Registration Wizard **can** scan the system's hard
  disk and compile information about the machine, including the
  installed software packages, but it does not look out onto any
  network the user might be connected to. To quote Russ Siegelman,
  General Manager of Microsoft Online Services, "this is done only
  with the user's consent and is not required to complete the
  registration." The complete text of what the Registration Wizard
  sends is supposed to be available in the file \WINDOWS\REGINFO.TXT
  - and **please** don't ask me to verify that.

  If all this makes you nervous, just use the snail mail
  registration card - or better yet, buy a Mac. And - for our
  paranoid readers - don't think other companies (Apple included)
  aren't thinking about similar online system profiling and
  reporting. Remember, you may not know what AOL, eWorld, or your
  Web browser is doing behind your back. Oh, one last thing, no more
  mail about this, OK? [GD]


AOL Buys Everyone
-----------------
  by Adam C. Engst <[e-mail]>

  Actually AOL hasn't bought everyone just yet, but at the rate they
  are acquiring companies, they'll put even acquisition-hungry
  Symantec to shame. There have been a number of purchases, so sit
  down, catch your breath, and pay attention to the new list of
  AOL's wholly-owned subsidiaries.

  The first purchase in recent history was AOL's acquisition of
  WAIS, Inc., the firm that spun off from Thinking Machines after
  the development of the WAIS (Wide Area Information Servers)
  technology. WAIS servers provide fast, full-text searching of
  massive databases and are widely used throughout the Internet as
  search engines. More recently, WAIS provided custom online
  services for publishers such as Encyclopedia Brittanica and Dow
  Jones. AOL paid for WAIS with 400,000 shares of AOL stock, which
  at the current price of about $37 per share works out to around
  $15 million. Not too shabby.

  But wait, it gets better. Last week, AOL announced that it has
  purchased GNN (Global Network Navigator) from O'Reilly &
  Associates for $11 million ($9 million in stock, $2 million in
  cash). And then, since GNN doesn't include any serious searching
  tools, AOL bought WebCrawler, one of the better Web full text
  search engines. Developed by Brian Pinkerton of the University of
  Washington, WebCrawler is used by more than 250,000 people each
  week, and it adds more than 2,000 new sites each month to its
  current 29,000 site index. AOL didn't say how much they paid Brian
  for WebCrawler, but I hope he made out well.

  Now, to look back, AOL has also purchased BookLink Technologies
  (makers of Internet client software for Windows) and NaviSoft, a
  company that's coming out with some interesting tools for creating
  Web pages. And of course, AOL's most important acquisition was ANS
  (Advanced Network & Services) in November of 1994, which has one
  of the largest and fastest public data networks (see
  TidBITS-254_).

  So let's put this together. AOL has a heavy-duty network from ANS,
  and alliances with Sprint greatly supplement that connectivity.
  AOL has its own client software (and version 2.6 - with Web access
  provided by code from InterCon's TCP/Connect II - is in testing;
  check the FTP URL below), and thanks to BookLink and NaviSoft, AOL
  has access to more code for both client applications and
  publishing programs. WAIS provides both server software and
  publishing deals.

ftp://ftp.aol.com//mac/Preview/
http://www.booklink.com/
http://www.navisoft.com/index.htm
http://www.wais.com/

  There's no question that AOL has a lot of content, much of which
  hasn't been available on the Internet. I'm curious to see how, or
  if, AOL merges its content with GNN, since although AOL talks up
  GNN pretty heavily, I'm not a big fan. Nonetheless, content isn't
  the issue for AOL right now - what's important to them is
  attention, and that's where GNN and WebCrawler stand to help.

http://www.gnn.com/
http://webcrawler.com/

  Overall, I can't think of any other company that's in such a
  strong position to compete directly with the impending (and well-
  funded) juggernaut of Microsoft Network. Although financial
  dealings aren't my strong point, I also wonder if AOL might be
  putting themselves in a weakened financial position through these
  acquisitions. Still, my bet is that in a few years it will be far
  more costly to assemble this sort of collection. As for how this
  will all shake out, only time will tell, being incapable of
  keeping a secret.

  One minor peeve: With all this Internet activity, why hasn't AOL
  put up a Web server with at least all of these press releases on
  it? Homilies about practicing what you preach come to mind.


ReadMe Files? Read This Follow-up!
----------------------------------
  by Tonya Engst <[e-mail]>

  TidBITS readers sent in a number of helpful or amusing comments in
  response to my "ReadMe Files? Read This!" article last week in
  TidBITS-279_. The most common message concerned the file names
  given to ReadMe files. People pointed out that the Macintosh
  offers 31 characters for a file name and suggested that ReadMe
  files use those characters to take on meaningful names.


**Wayne Morris** <[e-mail]> pointed out that the number
  of files that comes with a program can add to the confusion, "many
  software authors include several text files with their program: a
  ReadMe file, revision history, user's manual, etc. Sometimes none
  of these files is called "ReadMe," making it difficult to find an
  "elevator statement" and other key information. Each file should
  be clearly named, and the number of text files should be kept to a
  minimum.

  Wayne also had this to say, "Many software authors put the
  documentation into the program and/or use online help, and think
  they don't need a separate ReadMe file. Think again! I might
  download a program simply because of the name - perhaps I'm
  looking for a utility for a certain task, and the name sounds
  promising. But once I've got it, I want to know what the program
  actually does _before_ I run it. I'm even more reluctant to throw
  a new extension or control panel into my System Folder if there's
  no ReadMe file."


  A few readers focused on my complaint about read-only TeachText
  and SimpleText documents, which do not allow copy and paste so you
  cannot copy information (such as URLs or snail mail addresses)
  from them.


**Steve Rothman** pointed out, "Part of my job is creating ReadMe
  files for commercial software. I wanted to explain at least one
  valid reason for making the ReadMe files read-only. If you embed
  PICTs in the ReadMe, they often screw up the scrolling and screen
  display - unless the ReadMe is read-only. Fortunately, it's easy
  to convert to read only and back via ResEdit or a thousand other
  utilities for changing type and creator [you'd change it from ttro
  to TEXT]."


**Fabrizio Oddone** <[e-mail]> pointed out that Tex-Edit
  Plus [a $5 shareware utility] by Tom Bender can open read-only
  SimpleText documents and let you copy information out of them.

ftp://mirrors.aol.com//pub/info-mac/text/tex-edit-plus-132.hqx

Fabrizio also noted:
  Internet awareness is now easy to implement, thanks to Internet
  Config 1.1. In my opinion, a given application should implement
  four standard menus:

* Copy my/our email address
* Copy my/our WWW home page URL
* Send me/us email
* Show my/our WWW home page

  1 and 2 might always be active, and 3 and 4 might work via
  Internet Config. I think these should be "standard-spelled" menus,
  becoming, as the Internet grows more and more widespread, as
  pervasive as Cut/Copy/Paste. [I could see menus being overkill in
  some applications, but such functionality could certainly live in
  the About box. -Adam]


  And finally, <[e-mail]> whose name (perhaps
  intentionally!) didn't come through, contributed this advice to
  ReadMe authors, "I'd like to add that in my rread me experiences
  the one thing that sticks out is grammmmatical and speellling
  errors.' I was al set to send in my money to a paritcular guy bu t
  his spellling errorz were so bAd athAT i figured no way mAn!!! So
  he go tno monsye get it??? anyeway when ou do yo read mne files
  check th espeleling."


**Summing Up** -- So, in the end, if you write a ReadMe, try to
  follow these simple rules:

* Make it easy for readers to figure out what your product is
  called, what it does, who you are, and how to contact you. If
  appropriate, explain what the product costs and how to pay for it.

* Consider the pluses and minuses of a read-only TeachText or
  SimpleText file.

* Give the ReadMe file a meaningful name. If you include other
  informative files (such as a revision history or directions)
  consider whether or not it makes the most sense for them to be
  part of the ReadMe file. If you keep them separate, give them
  appropriate names.

* Make sure all of your files will be legible both onscreen and
  when printed. Keep in mind that screen size and font availability
  varies considerably from user to user.

* Run a spelling check. You could run a grammar check, but it's
  probably faster and more effective to just read the file out loud
  to yourself (though I expect this advice won't necessarily work
  for those trying to write a ReadMe file in a foreign language). If
  something sounds funny, fix it. You could also ask a friend to
  proofread the file.


A Studio in Silicon Valley
--------------------------
  by Dave Winer <[e-mail]>

  [Dave Winer founded UserLand Software and in 1992, shipped
  Frontier, which he is in the process of releasing for free to the
  Internet (see TidBITS-279_). Dave is also a columnist for
  HotWired, contributing essays like the one below. Check out Dave's
  many and varied projects on the Web at:]

http://www.hotwired.com/userland


**Bill & Microsoft** -- I missed the NBC TV documentary about Bill
  Gates on NBC last week, but I'm getting lots of email about it.
  The most interesting message came from Caryn Shalita
  <[e-mail]>. She says, "It may be silly, but I like having
  products made by companies that don't just fake a good vibe!"

  Yeah! Caryn comes from Los Angeles; not Seattle or Silicon Valley.
  She's an actress and webmaster and music nut.

  And I have lots to say about this. Right on. I hear a lot of
  dissonant notes from Bill's customers, which include some of his
  competitors. And Microsoft hasn't been able to muster an
  acceptable response to any of the claims that have been rattling
  around the corridors in the groups-of-ten of DaveNet mailings.

  I get a mixture of negative and positive vibes from Microsoft. For
  the second time I've had the accusatory finger pointed back at me.
  This time I was just the messenger, relaying a thoughtful flame,
  this time from a competitor - last time it was from a customer.
  I've seen Microsoft folks swarm all over a user and now a
  developer. It would be nice if they took us at face value. They
  could learn and grow. Be a better company. And deserve our support
  because their vibes could be seen as a positive thing, not a
  dangerous thing.

  Yes, Microsoft is dangerous. But so is a lot of life. We may be
  outraged, but we have to be careful. They do have a right to
  exist. Bill is right, there were risks involved. I remember back
  when Windows 3.0 shipped, it wasn't a slam-dunk. Should Microsoft
  be deprived of the harvest now? No way! It's still not a slam-
  dunk. Read InfoWorld. Windows 95 is in trouble.


**It's Not Easy Being Bill** -- Dave Carlick <[e-mail]> sends
  the Bill Gates Joke of the Week:

  God calls Boris Yeltsin, Bill Clinton and Bill Gates into his
  office and says, "The world will end in 30 days. Go back and tell
  your people." So, Boris Yeltsin goes to the Russian people and
  says, "I have bad news and I have worse news. The bad news is that
  we were wrong, there is a God. The worse news is that the world
  will end in 30 days." Bill Clinton goes on TV and tells the
  American people, "I have good news and I have bad news. The good
  news is that the basic family values upon which we have based our
  lives on are right - there is a God. The bad news is that the
  world will end in 30 days." Bill Gates goes to his executive
  committee and says, "I have great news and I have fabulous news.
  The great news is that God thinks I'm important. The fabulous news
  is that we don't have to ship Windows 95!"

  It's not easy being Bill. He's the focal point of a lot of
  negative energy. I get a small taste of that every time one of my
  pieces appears in Wired or HotWired. Negative energy in my inbox,
  from people who are angry with their mothers or fathers or life in
  general, and decide to let me have it! It's getting easier to push
  it back, and it makes me a better, stronger person to learn to let
  go of _their_ pain. I'm not here to make these strangers happy.

  Bill must get a mountain of negative energy. I glimpsed this back
  in an earlier round of email with Bill, a few months ago, when
  Word 6.0 for the Mac was The Big Problem. Bill said "I'm getting
  ten times more flames on this than anything else." Yes, Bill reads
  his email. And he's affected by it. Good for him and good for
  Microsoft. It's an amazing thing that he soaks up all that
  negative energy, processes it, and deals with it. It's hard to
  make these things positive. Because sometimes people must think
  Bill is their mother, just as some people think I am! The numbers
  must be much higher for Bill.

  But it goes the other way. Sometimes Microsoft people unleash
  their personal anger and direct it at the wrong place. I've seen
  it happen.


**A Microsoft Story** -- At a party thrown by Microsoft at last
  year's System Design Review (an annual assembly of the top
  developers from the leading software companies), I made the
  mistake of getting on the wrong bus.

  I was supposed to be on the bus for other-company developers.
  Instead, by accident, I got on a bus for Microsoft employees. It
  was dark. I was quiet. I listened to the sounds of Microsoft
  internal people talking about the developers attending the
  conference.

  Oh, the personal side of Microsoft - not a pretty sight! These
  people are not Bill Gates clones. Petty personal comments,
  disrespect, childish arrogance. It reminded me of the Apple of the
  1980s, elitist and insulated. I felt ashamed to be at this
  conference. I thought it was a sign of respect from Microsoft to
  be included, and I'm sure it was - from the top of the company.
  They saw me as an important developer, even though there were no
  revenues at UserLand to support that belief. They believed in me,
  personally. And that was before DaveNet happened, my public
  presence was almost nil at the time. The respect came from the top
  of the company. From the troops I was just another hopeless bozo
  that was going to be crushed by the new Big Blue Machine of
  Redmond. I heard them saying that in the dark quiet of Microsoft's
  corporate bus.

  I realized then that Microsoft is just another company. They hire
  from the general talent pool created by the American education
  system and get young people who mistakenly believe that they have
  extra insight into the world just because they work at a
  successful company. You can see Bill fighting against this,
  reminding his troops over and over that the competition has to be
  taken seriously, to be respected, to be feared. They require
  energy, intelligence, and creativity to be dispensed with. You
  can't just roll over them with mediocrity. But it must be a losing
  battle, even for a man of Gates's intensity and intelligence.
  Microsoft, with 17,000 people, is less and less Gates, and more
  and more average. It has to be that way.

  I believe Bill's epitaph will be a slightly above-average company,
  as long as he is willing to be this intense. If he ever lets go,
  and lets Microsoft run itself, it will revert to the norm - an
  American company with all its weaknesses and self-serving agendas.


**Why Companies?** -- All this leads me to the real question - why
  does Caryn expect great software to come from companies? What
  evidence is there that companies are the ideal organizational
  structure for creative, timely, and interesting software products?
  Is any other creative business structured this way? Can you
  imagine the Indigo Girls singing in three-piece suits? Making
  their bosses happy? And their boss's boss? And on and on. Add
  enough CYA and you drown inspiration and good vibes in corporate
  agendas, petty egos, and ass-kissing. I'm not questioning the
  premise of Microsoft specifically; just the mistaken idea that
  software is vastly different from other forms of creativity. It
  isn't.

  It's always frustrated to me to have my products evaluated based
  on the size of the company they come from. I've never met a
  company that could host my software without interfering. I've
  tried to compromise with the corporate model. But to hit the mark,
  I have to zig and zag, try out new ideas, learn and tweak, and go
  back and do it again. Most corporations have real problems with
  that approach. The Board of Directors wants detailed plans, head
  trips that predict exactly how a song will turn out. They want to
  see the numbers. I gave them the numbers they wanted, but they
  were lies. Eventually I had to divorce myself from the corporate
  scene. You can't build software out of lies.

  I've even seen software CEOs ask analysts to tell them what kinds
  of products they should make! What exactly is their contribution?
  Why be a software CEO if you don't trust your own intuition to
  tell you what kinds of products to make? Most analysts don't use
  the stuff. Same with CEOs.

  Of course, Hollywood is no panacea. They have fat, sweaty,
  mindless executives posturing and pretending they understand
  what's going on. Remember the Dogs Watching TV. But at least in
  L.A. they celebrate the individual - a movie makes a personal
  statement, not a corporate one. I've seen movies with fat, sweaty,
  mindless executives playing supporting roles to screenplay writers
  and actors who hate them. Who backed those movies? Cute!

  Corporations may appear to be devoid of emotions. Actually they
  are emotional breweries, but they are in denial. "Dave, you're
  being emotional again," I've heard it over and over. So what! My
  software comes from the heart. But the software industry wants to
  deny that. They want a sterile lab environment that spits out
  products that get four stars from PC Week Labs. Untouched by human
  hands. Good luck! That's Bill's game. You can't win by zigging
  when he zigs. You have to zag to beat Gates. He must know that.
  When will you guys figure it out?

  I see this unrealistic trust in the corporate system everywhere I
  go. John Doerr trusts Macromedia, but forgets Marc Canter, the
  genius who made Director happen. The world buys into Doerr's deals
  because they think Marc is still there. He isn't. No doubt
  Macromedia has smarts, but the blood of the company's creativity
  flows through Marc's veins, not Bud Colligan's.


**We Need Help** -- It's time for minds to bend. Let people with
  talent and passion experiment with new ideas. Bet on people with
  track records, like the entertainment industry does, and accept
  the probability that you can't pick the next _Forrest_Gump_ or
  _Pulp_Fiction_. Sheryl Crow appeared to be washed up, so did
  Bonnie Raitt. Look who's on top of the heap now!

  We miss many dynamics in the software business. The venture
  capitalists _are_ greedy, as I've said before. They trust people
  they can own. If you have an opinion, they don't want to deal with
  you. But that's not how you make money. Freedom of expression is
  the raw material from which great software is built. You can't
  control that freedom or you lose it. You get what you pay for.
  Control the people and you get predictable, boring, bloated, late
  software.

  Great passionate ideas make money. Lucky great passionate ideas
  make lots of money. To the money people, some advice: relax,
  spread it around, and hope you get lucky!

  We need help here in Silicon Valley. We're stuck playing the same
  old songs over and over. Head trips everywhere. Creative people
  need to be set free and given the resources they need, so products
  can be great and timely. Money is _not_ the most precious thing.
  Passion and talent are. I don't care if the money comes from
  Steven Spielberg or Bill Gates or John Doerr. We'll know when the
  dam is ready to burst, a studio in Silicon Valley that really
  celebrated the individual creator would be a huge win.


Reviews/05-Jun-95
-----------------

* MacWEEK -- 29-May-95, Vol. 9, #22
    HP ScanJet 3c 30-bit scanner -- pg. 28
    SoftArc FirstClass 2.6 -- pg. 28
    Strata MediaPaint -- pg. 30
    Cadmover 4.0 -- pg. 31


$$

 Non-profit, non-commercial publications may reprint articles if
 full credit is given. Others please contact us. We don't guarantee
 accuracy of articles. Caveat lector. Publication, product, and
 company names may be registered trademarks of their companies.

 This file is formatted as setext. For more information send email
 to <[e-mail]>. A file will be returned shortly.

 For information on TidBITS: how to subscribe, where to find back
 issues, and other useful stuff, send email to: <[e-mail]>
 Send comments and editorial submissions to: <[e-mail]>
 Issues available at: ftp://ftp.tidbits.com/pub/tidbits/issues/
 And: http://www.dartmouth.edu/pages/TidBITS/TidBITS.html
 To search back issues with WAIS, use this URL via a Web browser:
 http://www.wais.com/wais-dbs/macintosh-tidbits.html
 -------------------------------------------------------------------